The Organizational Cohesion Of Insurgent Groups Is Central To Explaining Patterns Of Violence, The Effectiveness Of Counterinsurgency, And Civil War Outcomes Cohesive Insurgent Groups Produce Effective War Fighting Forces And Are Credible Negotiators Organizational Cohesion Shapes Both The Duration Of Wars And Their Ultimate Resolution In Networks Of Rebellion, Paul Staniland Explains Why Insurgent Leaders Differ So Radically In Their Ability To Build Strong Organizations And Why The Cohesion Of Armed Groups Changes Over Time During Conflicts He Outlines A New Way Of Thinking About The Sources And Structure Of Insurgent Groups, Distinguishing Among Integrated, Vanguard, Parochial, And Fragmented Groups.Staniland Compares Insurgent Groups, Their Differing Social Bases, And How The Nature Of The Coalitions And Networks Within Which These Armed Groups Were Built Has Determined Their Discipline And Internal Control He Examines Insurgent Groups In Afghanistan, 1975 To The Present Day, Kashmir 1988 2003 , Sri Lanka From The 1970s To The Defeat Of The Tamil Tigers In 2009, And Several Communist Uprisings In Southeast Asia During The Cold War The Initial Organization Of An Insurgent Group Depends On The Position Of Its Leaders In Prewar Political Networks These Social Bases Shape What Leaders Can And Cannot Do When They Build A New Insurgent Group Counterinsurgency, Insurgent Strategy, And International Intervention Can Cause Organizational Change During War, Insurgent Groups Are Embedded In Social Ties That Determine They How They Organize, Fight, And Negotiate As These Ties Shift, Organizational Structure Changes As Well.
[Read] ➻ Networks of Rebellion ➸ Paul Staniland – Soaringeaglecasino.us
- 300 pages
- Networks of Rebellion
- Paul Staniland
- 06 October 2017 Paul Staniland